On-line services delivery
Forum » General / General » On-line services delivery
Started by: Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova
On: 1256614364|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Number of posts: 9
rss icon RSS: New posts
Summary:
Preliminary findings of a benchmarking study
On-line services delivery
Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova 1256614364|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Hi, Everyone,

We are conducting a study into on-line services delivery (covering Australian and New Zealand local councils), and I would like to share some preliminary findings with you and seek your views/ comments.

One of the areas I am looking into is financial benefits - the revenue attributed to the services delivered on-line appears to be around 3% of the total council revenue (this is an average across local councils). It looks a bit low. About 30% of the councils that participated in our survey so far reported that more than 10% of their rates transactions are executed on-line, but I can not see this being reflected in the revenue.

Any views?

Thanks,

Leila
Research Director
Technology Indicators

Reply  |  Options
Unfold On-line services delivery by Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova, 1256614364|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: On-line services delivery
darronlpasslowdarronlpasslow 1256707383|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Leila
The confusion over your results may be the different interpretation of what you are asking.
When I initially read "the revenue attributed to the services delivered on-line", I did not think of receiving rates via the internet.
The internet is only an enabling technology here. An on line service did not deliver the revenue. I think this is stretching the scope.
I think of delivering documents and plans over the internet that are paid for after this "electronic" transaction.
Take out the rates payments (on-line) and certainly our Council would do very little.
There is also electronic application for government grants - again this is the mechanism not the revenue generator!
Again I think you need to make sure you are asking the same questions and providing the same background information in a survey. Just a thought.

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Re: On-line services delivery by darronlpasslowdarronlpasslow, 1256707383|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: On-line services delivery
Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova 1256768124|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Hi, Darron

Thank you for your comments. In order to assess financial benefits local councils realise via their on-line service delivery channel we asked local councils to estimate

a) total $$ from on-line public services (rates, registrations, applications, any other services councils may have )
b) total $$ from business services (rates, registrations, applications, tenders and any other services)
c) total cost savings.

3% (of the total council revenue) reflects an average for the total revenue derived from on-line services. I am also looking into non-financial benefits. Better understanding of the on-line revenue may assist councils with planning / prioritization of their e-initiatives.

Thanks,
Leila

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Re: On-line services delivery by Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova, 1256768124|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: On-line services delivery
Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova 1256683478|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Hi, Everyone,

One of the aspects of on-line service delivery / Local E-Government we are looking into is utilization of interactive / Web2.0 concepts and tools.

Preliminary results of our study show that although many local councils feel that they would benefit from the adoption of blogs/discussion forums and knowledge sharing (wikis, SlideShare, etc), one of the key issues is to find the right staff to make use of these tools (our study captures management perspectives on this topic). The issue appears to be not only about availability of the staff to engage in knowledge sharing and/or e-consultations with customers, but also lack of skills – eg ability to moderate discussion forums and process unstructured data.

Although there are other issues with the adoption of Web 2.0 concepts, including lack of demand for this in the areas with low internet penetration /poor internet performance, it looks like addressing the staffing/skills issues may be critical for determining the future of Web2.0 in LG.

What do you think? Does anyone have an example of or strategies for upskilling people to make use of the tools like Twitter, wikis and discussion forums?

Leila
Technology Indicators

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Re: On-line services delivery by Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova, 1256683478|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: On-line services delivery
Wayne EddyWayne Eddy 1256691391|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Hi Leila,

It is an interesting question. In my experience it is not staffing/skills issues that limit the uptake of Web 2.0 concepts. I think the main battle is to make staff see that web2.0 can make their (work) life easier. I think someone who is properly motivated to contribute to a wiki (for example) could probably learn to use one with reasonable proficiency in less than a day.

Having said that, I am more than happy to be proved wrong, so if there is anyone out there that would like to contribute to this wiki, but feels that they haven't the skills to do so, please let me know.

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Re: On-line services delivery by Wayne EddyWayne Eddy, 1256691391|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: On-line services delivery
darronlpasslowdarronlpasslow 1256710136|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Leila
What I have found after setting up an internal WSC Wiki for discussing Community Engagement (within the Council at this stage) is that even after limited, focussed marketing of the site (to managers and competent staff with the requisite IT skills), the uptake has been minimal.
The main problem is that all staff here have so many reporting obligations and so many different software tools that are mandated for this reporting, that there is very little bandwidth (and particularly no incentive) to repeat information or try a new ("non mandated") mechanism.
Some of us who take the time to understand the power of new technology and the benefits of using it, need to work with others to get them involved. However this will be a slow process. Another suggestion (from US based wiki - that I am a member of) is that mandating the use of new technology is the only way to get it moving. This might be the "heavy handed" approach needed here?
DP

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Re: On-line services delivery by darronlpasslowdarronlpasslow, 1256710136|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: On-line services delivery
Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova 1256685446|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

About 30% of the local councils that participated in our study so far reported that they do not process rates transactions via internet. Key issues here appear to be inadequate functionality of the existing IT systems and difficulties with integration of e-solutions with core back-end systems.

Does anyone have an example of an efficient deployment / integration of e-solutions for rates payments?

Thanks,
Leila
Technology Indicators

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Re: On-line services delivery by Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova, 1256685446|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: On-line services delivery
darronlpasslowdarronlpasslow 1256709412|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Leila
While I am on your survey, I checked with our Council (Wingecarribee Shire - NSW - Regional/Rural council) and only 3% of payments come into Council via internet payments. This is 3% of the rate payers pay their rates via internet (not a percentage of our total revenues). Hope this makes sense.
DP

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Re: On-line services delivery by darronlpasslowdarronlpasslow, 1256709412|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: On-line services delivery
Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova 1256770344|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Our survey (LG on-line services delivery) will be open for another 2 weeks (while I am processing the results). The demand for e-services and pressures for their efficient delivery are growing. This study aims to provide local councils with comparative data that would enable them to validate and calibrate their e-strategies and practices.

Similar studies have been done overseas - for example, in the UK, local councils' websites are ranked annually. On the national level, UN ranks e-government capabilities of about 200 nations every 2 years.

If you like to share your perspective, and, in return, leverage a collective experience of our peers, please contact me via my e-mail. This survey is open to Australian and New Zealand local councils, and all participating councils will receive a complimentary copy of a report based on the survey results.

The first part of this study captures business perspectives and looks into e-strategies from the point of view of 4 key business objectives – Public Service, Business/Economic Development, Financial Sustainability/ Efficient Operation and Community Engagement. A questionnaire designed for Corporate Services and Comms Managers takes about 15 min to complete.

The second part of the study enables benchmarking of e-capabilities using 18 parameters grouped around 3 key functions of LG websites – Inform, Transact and Engage. A questionnaire designed for IT Managers takes 10-15 min.

Thanks,

ua.moc.srotacidni-hcet|avosabba_aliel#alieL

Reply  |  Options
Unfold Re: On-line services delivery by Leila AbbasovaLeila Abbasova, 1256770344|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
New Post
page_revision: 0, last_edited: 1223868605|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z (%O ago)
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License